Career Inventory Test Results
|
personality tests by similarminds.com
I stole this quiz from friend and took it. What do you thinik? Does this sound like me?
Career Inventory Test Results
|
Career Inventory Test Results
|
He [here Pollan is referencing the farmer] reminded me that his meat would be considerably cheaper than it is if not for government regulations and the resulting high cost of processing – at least a dollar cheaper per pound. 'If we could just level the playing field – take away the regulations, the subsidies and factor in the health care and environmental cleanup costs of cheap food – we could compete on price with anyone.'
It’s true that cheap industrial food is heavily subsidized in many ways such that its price in the supermarket does not reflects its real cost. But until the rules that govern our food system change, organic or sustainable food is going to cost more at the register, more than some people can afford. Yet for the great majority of us the story is not quite so simple. As a society we Americans spend only a fraction of our disposable income feeding ourselves – about a tenth, down from a fifth in the 1950’s. American’s today spend less on food, as a percentage of disposable income, than any other industrialized nation, and probably less than any people in the history of the world. This suggests that there are many of us who could afford to spend more on food if we chose to. After all, it isn’t only the elite who in recent years have found an extra fifty or one hundred dollars each month to spend on cell phones (now owned by more than half the U.S., population, children included) or television, which close to 90 percent of all U.S. households now pay for…So is the unwillingness to pay more for food really a matter of affordability or priority?"
Isn't our health and environment worth it? I'm off to find a local produce farmer as we speak...He [here Pollan is referencing the farmer] reminded me that his meat would be considerably cheaper than it is if not for government regulations and the resulting high cost of processing – at least a dollar cheaper per pound. 'If we could just level the playing field – take away the regulations, the subsidies and factor in the health care and environmental cleanup costs of cheap food – we could compete on price with anyone.'
It’s true that cheap industrial food is heavily subsidized in many ways such that its price in the supermarket does not reflects its real cost. But until the rules that govern our food system change, organic or sustainable food is going to cost more at the register, more than some people can afford. Yet for the great majority of us the story is not quite so simple. As a society we Americans spend only a fraction of our disposable income feeding ourselves – about a tenth, down from a fifth in the 1950’s. American’s today spend less on food, as a percentage of disposable income, than any other industrialized nation, and probably less than any people in the history of the world. This suggests that there are many of us who could afford to spend more on food if we chose to. After all, it isn’t only the elite who in recent years have found an extra fifty or one hundred dollars each month to spend on cell phones (now owned by more than half the U.S., population, children included) or television, which close to 90 percent of all U.S. households now pay for…So is the unwillingness to pay more for food really a matter of affordability or priority?"
Isn't our health and environment worth it? I'm off to find a local produce farmer as we speak...